Giva, Inc. is the sponsor of this reprint from The American Lawyer's annual Midlevel Associates Survey. Giva has a special focus on law firms and we are an industry expert and provider of IT Service Desk/Help Desk Cloud Computing. See our Customer Case Studies or contact us for more information at (408)
2013 Associate Technology Survey
Rankings by Firm's Technical Support
|
|
Technical |
Firm's |
|
|
Rank |
Firm Name |
Overall |
Total |
||
Support |
Composite |
Respondents |
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Score |
|
|
1 |
Paul Hastings |
4.76 |
4.75 |
51 |
|
2 |
Alston & Bird |
4.64 |
4.11 |
42 |
|
3 |
O'Melveny & Myers |
4.48 |
4.35 |
163 |
|
4 |
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher |
4.47 |
4.5 |
92 |
|
5 |
Cravath Swaine & Moore |
4.46 |
4.12 |
57 |
|
6 |
Nutter McClennen & Fish |
4.43 |
4.47 |
14 |
|
7 |
White and Williams |
4.42 |
4.23 |
12 |
|
8 |
Thompson Coburn |
4.41 |
4.37 |
17 |
|
8 |
Shook Hardy & Bacon |
4.41 |
3.99 |
18 |
|
10 |
Schulte Roth & Zabel |
4.4 |
4.2 |
38 |
|
11 |
Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi |
4.39 |
4.24 |
23 |
|
11 |
Cozen O'Connor |
4.39 |
4.12 |
18 |
|
13 |
Ropes & Gray |
4.36 |
4.24 |
110 |
|
14 |
Latham & Watkins |
4.35 |
4.3 |
235 |
|
15 |
DLA Piper |
4.34 |
4.15 |
78 |
|
16 |
Chapman and Cutler |
4.31 |
4.28 |
14 |
|
17 |
Gibbons |
4.29 |
4.28 |
14 |
|
17 |
Morgan Lewis & Bockius |
4.29 |
4.21 |
111 |
|
19 |
Winston & Strawn |
4.27 |
4.01 |
56 |
|
20 |
Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo |
4.21 |
3.96 |
14 |
|
21 |
Blank Rome |
4.2 |
3.93 |
41 |
|
22 |
Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom |
4.19 |
3.94 |
63 |
|
23 |
Holland & Knight |
4.18 |
4.01 |
64 |
|
24 |
Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe |
4.16 |
3.84 |
121 |
|
25 |
Fish & Richardson |
4.14 |
3.99 |
36 |
|
25 |
Perkins Coie |
4.14 |
3.87 |
98 |
|
27 |
Lindquist & Vennum |
4.12 |
3.99 |
17 |
|
28 |
Weil Gotshal & Manges |
4.11 |
3.82 |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical |
Firm's |
|
|
Rank |
Firm Name |
Overall |
Total |
||
Support |
Composite |
Respondents |
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Score |
|
|
29 |
Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson |
4.1 |
3.95 |
10 |
|
30 |
Fenwick & West |
4.08 |
3.97 |
61 |
|
30 |
Kirkland & Ellis |
4.08 |
3.78 |
163 |
|
32 |
Thompson & Knight |
4.07 |
3.84 |
15 |
|
33 |
Harris Beach |
4.06 |
3.9 |
18 |
|
33 |
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton |
4.06 |
3.81 |
79 |
|
35 |
Vedder Price |
4.05 |
3.64 |
21 |
|
36 |
Proskauer Rose |
4.04 |
3.98 |
24 |
|
37 |
Jenner & Block |
4.02 |
3.83 |
42 |
|
38 |
Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner |
4 |
4.14 |
42 |
|
38 |
McCarter & English |
4 |
3.93 |
11 |
|
38 |
Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto |
4 |
3.9 |
13 |
|
38 |
Sedgwick |
4 |
3.89 |
10 |
|
38 |
Carlton Fields |
4 |
3.85 |
16 |
|
38 |
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld |
4 |
3.79 |
40 |
|
44 |
Sidley Austin |
3.99 |
3.7 |
72 |
|
45 |
Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison |
3.97 |
3.84 |
36 |
|
46 |
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman |
3.96 |
3.82 |
25 |
|
46 |
Choate Hall & Stewart |
3.96 |
3.8 |
28 |
|
46 |
Morrison & Foerster |
3.96 |
3.7 |
134 |
|
49 |
Holland & Hart |
3.95 |
4 |
22 |
|
49 |
Davis Polk & Wardwell |
3.95 |
3.76 |
43 |
|
51 |
Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler |
3.94 |
3.93 |
18 |
|
51 |
Munger Tolles & Olson |
3.94 |
3.5 |
17 |
|
53 |
Miles & Stockbridge |
3.93 |
3.88 |
14 |
|
54 |
Harter Secrest & Emery |
3.92 |
4.08 |
14 |
|
55 |
Hughes Hubbard & Reed |
3.91 |
3.81 |
45 |
|
56 |
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati |
3.89 |
3.82 |
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
www.givainc.com |
1 |
Rankings by Firm's Technical Support
|
|
Technical |
Firm's |
|
|
Rank |
Firm Name |
Overall |
Total |
||
Support |
Composite |
Respondents |
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Score |
|
|
56 |
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett |
3.89 |
3.59 |
75 |
|
58 |
Gunderson Dettmer Stough Villeneuve Franklin & Hachigian |
3.88 |
3.78 |
17 |
|
58 |
Vinson & Elkins |
3.88 |
3.77 |
78 |
|
60 |
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton |
3.87 |
3.74 |
48 |
|
61 |
Davis Wright Tremaine |
3.86 |
3.6 |
29 |
|
62 |
McDermott Will & Emery |
3.84 |
3.59 |
57 |
|
63 |
Snell & Wilmer |
3.83 |
3.84 |
29 |
|
63 |
Dorsey & Whitney |
3.83 |
3.73 |
24 |
|
63 |
Faegre Baker Daniels |
3.83 |
3.64 |
35 |
|
66 |
Duane Morris |
3.82 |
3.77 |
28 |
|
66 |
Bingham McCutchen |
3.82 |
3.66 |
17 |
|
66 |
Venable |
3.82 |
3.66 |
39 |
|
66 |
Foley & Lardner |
3.82 |
3.64 |
45 |
|
70 |
Greenberg Traurig |
3.8 |
3.69 |
46 |
|
70 |
Cooley |
3.8 |
3.61 |
84 |
|
72 |
Troutman Sanders |
3.79 |
3.75 |
14 |
|
73 |
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan |
3.78 |
3.96 |
19 |
|
74 |
Linklaters |
3.77 |
3.46 |
23 |
|
75 |
Cahill Gordon & Reindel |
3.75 |
3.79 |
77 |
|
76 |
Fox Rothschild |
3.74 |
3.73 |
39 |
|
77 |
BuckleySandler |
3.73 |
4.07 |
11 |
|
77 |
Best Best & Krieger |
3.73 |
3.69 |
15 |
|
77 |
Baker & Hostetler |
3.73 |
3.67 |
57 |
|
77 |
Susman Godfrey |
3.73 |
3.41 |
11 |
|
77 |
Ballard Spahr |
3.73 |
3.38 |
15 |
|
77 |
Dentons |
3.73 |
3.13 |
26 |
|
83 |
Littler Mendelson |
3.7 |
3.82 |
45 |
|
84 |
Reed Smith |
3.69 |
3.42 |
63 |
|
85 |
Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz |
3.68 |
3.91 |
29 |
|
86 |
Arent Fox |
3.67 |
3.59 |
25 |
|
86 |
Quarles & Brady |
3.67 |
3.52 |
12 |
|
86 |
Sullivan & Cromwell |
3.67 |
3.45 |
32 |
|
89 |
Foley Hoag |
3.65 |
3.85 |
17 |
|
89 |
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr |
3.65 |
3.59 |
105 |
|
89 |
Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young |
3.65 |
3.52 |
17 |
|
92 |
Pepper Hamilton |
3.63 |
3.54 |
56 |
|
93 |
Baker & McKenzie |
3.62 |
3.47 |
29 |
|
93 |
Arnold & Porter |
3.62 |
3.37 |
57 |
|
95 |
Goodwin Procter |
3.6 |
3.59 |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical |
Firm's |
|
|
Rank |
Firm Name |
Overall |
Total |
||
Support |
Composite |
Respondents |
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Score |
|
|
96 |
Irell & Manella |
3.58 |
3.53 |
26 |
|
96 |
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan |
3.58 |
3.42 |
12 |
|
98 |
Williams Mullen |
3.57 |
3.66 |
14 |
|
99 |
Kelley Drye & Warren |
3.56 |
3.26 |
19 |
|
100 |
Hogan Lovells |
3.55 |
3.59 |
31 |
|
101 |
Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor |
3.54 |
3.91 |
13 |
|
101 |
Loeb & Loeb |
3.54 |
3.58 |
14 |
|
101 |
Covington & Burling |
3.54 |
3.44 |
52 |
|
104 |
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel |
3.53 |
3.51 |
35 |
|
105 |
Haynes and Boone |
3.49 |
3.56 |
47 |
|
105 |
Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson |
3.49 |
3.24 |
66 |
|
107 |
Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy |
3.47 |
3.38 |
103 |
|
107 |
Dechert |
3.47 |
3.29 |
98 |
|
109 |
Katten Muchin Rosenman |
3.45 |
3.49 |
53 |
|
109 |
Saul Ewing |
3.45 |
3.32 |
22 |
|
111 |
K&L Gates |
3.44 |
3.22 |
129 |
|
112 |
Debevoise & Plimpton |
3.42 |
3.21 |
39 |
|
113 |
Shearman & Sterling |
3.38 |
3.27 |
39 |
|
114 |
Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft |
3.35 |
3.34 |
26 |
|
114 |
White & Case |
3.35 |
3.31 |
77 |
|
116 |
Stites & Harbison |
3.33 |
3.46 |
18 |
|
116 |
Drinker Biddle & Reath |
3.33 |
3.28 |
49 |
|
118 |
Chadbourne & Parke |
3.32 |
3.11 |
19 |
|
119 |
King & Spalding |
3.3 |
3.12 |
61 |
|
120 |
Mayer Brown |
3.23 |
3.31 |
49 |
|
121 |
Goulston & Storrs |
3.2 |
3.45 |
10 |
|
121 |
Nixon Peabody |
3.2 |
3.34 |
16 |
|
123 |
Steptoe & Johnson |
3.18 |
3.16 |
22 |
|
124 |
Kaye Scholer |
3.12 |
2.98 |
52 |
|
125 |
Dickstein Shapiro |
3.11 |
3.31 |
18 |
|
126 |
Winstead |
3.09 |
3.37 |
11 |
|
126 |
Willkie Farr & Gallagher |
3.09 |
3.04 |
58 |
|
128 |
Schiff Hardin |
3 |
2.93 |
17 |
|
129 |
Sullivan & Worcester |
2.93 |
3.29 |
14 |
|
130 |
Manatt Phelps & Phillips |
2.77 |
2.73 |
26 |
|
131 |
Patton Boggs |
2.64 |
2.64 |
11 |
|
131 |
Boies Schiller & Flexner |
2.64 |
2.33 |
46 |
|
133 |
Crowell & Moring |
2.4 |
2.65 |
16 |
|
134 |
Clifford Chance |
2.18 |
2.07 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
www.givainc.com |
2 |
Rankings by Firm's Technology Overall Composite Score
|
|
Firm's |
Technical |
Total |
|
Rank |
Firm Name |
Overall |
|||
Composite |
Support |
Respondents |
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
Score |
|
|
|
1 |
Paul Hastings |
4.75 |
4.76 |
51 |
|
2 |
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher |
4.5 |
4.47 |
92 |
|
3 |
Nutter McClennen & Fish |
4.47 |
4.43 |
14 |
|
4 |
Thompson Coburn |
4.37 |
4.41 |
17 |
|
5 |
O'Melveny & Myers |
4.35 |
4.48 |
163 |
|
6 |
Latham & Watkins |
4.3 |
4.35 |
235 |
|
8 |
Chapman and Cutler |
4.28 |
4.31 |
14 |
|
7 |
Gibbons |
4.28 |
4.29 |
14 |
|
9 |
Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi |
4.24 |
4.39 |
23 |
|
9 |
Ropes & Gray |
4.24 |
4.36 |
110 |
|
11 |
White and Williams |
4.23 |
4.42 |
12 |
|
12 |
Morgan Lewis & Bockius |
4.21 |
4.29 |
111 |
|
13 |
Schulte Roth & Zabel |
4.2 |
4.4 |
38 |
|
14 |
DLA Piper |
4.15 |
4.34 |
78 |
|
15 |
Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner |
4.14 |
4 |
42 |
|
16 |
Cravath Swaine & Moore |
4.12 |
4.46 |
57 |
|
16 |
Cozen O'Connor |
4.12 |
4.39 |
18 |
|
18 |
Alston & Bird |
4.11 |
4.64 |
42 |
|
19 |
Harter Secrest & Emery |
4.08 |
3.92 |
14 |
|
20 |
BuckleySandler |
4.07 |
3.73 |
11 |
|
21 |
Winston & Strawn |
4.01 |
4.27 |
56 |
|
22 |
Holland & Knight |
4.01 |
4.18 |
64 |
|
23 |
Holland & Hart |
4 |
3.95 |
22 |
|
24 |
Shook Hardy & Bacon |
3.99 |
4.41 |
18 |
|
25 |
Fish & Richardson |
3.99 |
4.14 |
36 |
|
26 |
Lindquist & Vennum |
3.99 |
4.12 |
17 |
|
27 |
Proskauer Rose |
3.98 |
4.04 |
24 |
|
28 |
Fenwick & West |
3.97 |
4.08 |
61 |
|
29 |
Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo |
3.96 |
4.21 |
14 |
|
30 |
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan |
3.96 |
3.78 |
19 |
|
31 |
Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson |
3.95 |
4.1 |
10 |
|
32 |
Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom |
3.94 |
4.19 |
63 |
|
34 |
Blank Rome |
3.93 |
4.2 |
41 |
|
33 |
McCarter & English |
3.93 |
4 |
11 |
|
34 |
Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler |
3.93 |
3.94 |
18 |
|
36 |
Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz |
3.91 |
3.68 |
29 |
|
36 |
Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor |
3.91 |
3.54 |
13 |
|
38 |
Harris Beach |
3.9 |
4.06 |
18 |
|
39 |
Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto |
3.9 |
4 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firm's |
Technical |
Total |
|
Rank |
Firm Name |
Overall |
|||
Composite |
Support |
Respondents |
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
Score |
|
|
|
40 |
Sedgwick |
3.89 |
4 |
10 |
|
41 |
Miles & Stockbridge |
3.88 |
3.93 |
14 |
|
42 |
Perkins Coie |
3.87 |
4.14 |
98 |
|
44 |
Carlton Fields |
3.85 |
4 |
16 |
|
43 |
Foley Hoag |
3.85 |
3.65 |
17 |
|
45 |
Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe |
3.84 |
4.16 |
121 |
|
47 |
Thompson & Knight |
3.84 |
4.07 |
15 |
|
45 |
Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison |
3.84 |
3.97 |
36 |
|
47 |
Snell & Wilmer |
3.84 |
3.83 |
29 |
|
49 |
Jenner & Block |
3.83 |
4.02 |
42 |
|
50 |
Weil Gotshal & Manges |
3.82 |
4.11 |
45 |
|
50 |
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman |
3.82 |
3.96 |
25 |
|
50 |
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati |
3.82 |
3.89 |
57 |
|
53 |
Littler Mendelson |
3.82 |
3.7 |
45 |
|
54 |
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton |
3.81 |
4.06 |
79 |
|
55 |
Hughes Hubbard & Reed |
3.81 |
3.91 |
45 |
|
56 |
Choate Hall & Stewart |
3.8 |
3.96 |
28 |
|
58 |
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld |
3.79 |
4 |
40 |
|
57 |
Cahill Gordon & Reindel |
3.79 |
3.75 |
77 |
|
59 |
Kirkland & Ellis |
3.78 |
4.08 |
163 |
|
60 |
Gunderson Dettmer Stough Villeneuve Franklin & Hachigian |
3.78 |
3.88 |
17 |
|
61 |
Vinson & Elkins |
3.77 |
3.88 |
78 |
|
62 |
Duane Morris |
3.77 |
3.82 |
28 |
|
63 |
Davis Polk & Wardwell |
3.76 |
3.95 |
43 |
|
64 |
Troutman Sanders |
3.75 |
3.79 |
14 |
|
65 |
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton |
3.74 |
3.87 |
48 |
|
66 |
Dorsey & Whitney |
3.73 |
3.83 |
24 |
|
67 |
Fox Rothschild |
3.73 |
3.74 |
39 |
|
68 |
Sidley Austin |
3.7 |
3.99 |
72 |
|
69 |
Morrison & Foerster |
3.7 |
3.96 |
134 |
|
70 |
Greenberg Traurig |
3.69 |
3.8 |
46 |
|
71 |
Best Best & Krieger |
3.69 |
3.73 |
15 |
|
72 |
Baker & Hostetler |
3.67 |
3.73 |
57 |
|
73 |
Bingham McCutchen |
3.66 |
3.82 |
17 |
|
75 |
Venable |
3.66 |
3.82 |
39 |
|
74 |
Williams Mullen |
3.66 |
3.57 |
14 |
|
76 |
Vedder Price |
3.64 |
4.05 |
21 |
|
76 |
Faegre Baker Daniels |
3.64 |
3.83 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
www.givainc.com |
3 |
Rankings by Firm's Technology Overall Composite Score
|
|
Firm's |
Technical |
Total |
|
Rank |
Firm Name |
Overall |
|||
Composite |
Support |
Respondents |
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
Score |
|
|
|
76 |
Foley & Lardner |
3.64 |
3.82 |
45 |
|
79 |
Cooley |
3.61 |
3.8 |
84 |
|
80 |
Davis Wright Tremaine |
3.6 |
3.86 |
29 |
|
86 |
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett |
3.59 |
3.89 |
75 |
|
83 |
McDermott Will & Emery |
3.59 |
3.84 |
57 |
|
83 |
Arent Fox |
3.59 |
3.67 |
25 |
|
81 |
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr |
3.59 |
3.65 |
105 |
|
83 |
Goodwin Procter |
3.59 |
3.6 |
41 |
|
81 |
Hogan Lovells |
3.59 |
3.55 |
31 |
|
87 |
Loeb & Loeb |
3.58 |
3.54 |
14 |
|
88 |
Haynes and Boone |
3.56 |
3.49 |
47 |
|
89 |
Pepper Hamilton |
3.54 |
3.63 |
56 |
|
90 |
Irell & Manella |
3.53 |
3.58 |
26 |
|
91 |
Quarles & Brady |
3.52 |
3.67 |
12 |
|
92 |
Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young |
3.52 |
3.65 |
17 |
|
93 |
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel |
3.51 |
3.53 |
35 |
|
94 |
Munger Tolles & Olson |
3.5 |
3.94 |
17 |
|
95 |
Katten Muchin Rosenman |
3.49 |
3.45 |
53 |
|
96 |
Baker & McKenzie |
3.47 |
3.62 |
29 |
|
97 |
Linklaters |
3.46 |
3.77 |
23 |
|
98 |
Stites & Harbison |
3.46 |
3.33 |
18 |
|
100 |
Sullivan & Cromwell |
3.45 |
3.67 |
32 |
|
99 |
Goulston & Storrs |
3.45 |
3.2 |
10 |
|
101 |
Covington & Burling |
3.44 |
3.54 |
52 |
|
102 |
Reed Smith |
3.42 |
3.69 |
63 |
|
103 |
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan |
3.42 |
3.58 |
12 |
|
104 |
Susman Godfrey |
3.41 |
3.73 |
11 |
|
105 |
Ballard Spahr |
3.38 |
3.73 |
15 |
|
105 |
Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy |
3.38 |
3.47 |
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firm's |
Technical |
Total |
|
Rank |
Firm Name |
Overall |
|||
Composite |
Support |
Respondents |
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
Score |
|
|
|
107 |
Arnold & Porter |
3.37 |
3.62 |
57 |
|
108 |
Winstead |
3.37 |
3.09 |
11 |
|
109 |
Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft |
3.34 |
3.35 |
26 |
|
110 |
Nixon Peabody |
3.34 |
3.2 |
16 |
|
111 |
Saul Ewing |
3.32 |
3.45 |
22 |
|
112 |
White & Case |
3.31 |
3.35 |
77 |
|
112 |
Mayer Brown |
3.31 |
3.23 |
49 |
|
112 |
Dickstein Shapiro |
3.31 |
3.11 |
18 |
|
115 |
Dechert |
3.29 |
3.47 |
98 |
|
116 |
Sullivan & Worcester |
3.29 |
2.93 |
14 |
|
117 |
Drinker Biddle & Reath |
3.28 |
3.33 |
49 |
|
118 |
Shearman & Sterling |
3.27 |
3.38 |
39 |
|
119 |
Kelley Drye & Warren |
3.26 |
3.56 |
19 |
|
120 |
Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson |
3.24 |
3.49 |
66 |
|
121 |
K&L Gates |
3.22 |
3.44 |
129 |
|
122 |
Debevoise & Plimpton |
3.21 |
3.42 |
39 |
|
123 |
Steptoe & Johnson |
3.16 |
3.18 |
22 |
|
124 |
Dentons |
3.13 |
3.73 |
26 |
|
125 |
King & Spalding |
3.12 |
3.3 |
61 |
|
126 |
Chadbourne & Parke |
3.11 |
3.32 |
19 |
|
127 |
Willkie Farr & Gallagher |
3.04 |
3.09 |
58 |
|
128 |
Kaye Scholer |
2.98 |
3.12 |
52 |
|
129 |
Schiff Hardin |
2.93 |
3 |
17 |
|
130 |
Manatt Phelps & Phillips |
2.73 |
2.77 |
26 |
|
131 |
Crowell & Moring |
2.65 |
2.4 |
16 |
|
132 |
Patton Boggs |
2.64 |
2.64 |
11 |
|
133 |
Boies Schiller & Flexner |
2.33 |
2.64 |
46 |
|
134 |
Clifford Chance |
2.07 |
2.18 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Methodology
As part of The American Lawyer's annual Midlevel Associates Survey midlevel
Reprinted with permission from the August 2013 edition of the Associate Technology Survey from ALM LEGAL INTELLIGENCE and THE AMERICAN LAWYER © 2013 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All rights reserved. Further duplication without permission is prohibited. For information, contact
www.givainc.com |
4 |