Giva Blog

The kickoff call for your new IT Service Management (ITSM) tool is going well until the implementation partner asks for your ticket categories, your templates and required fields, what counts as high priority, and your service level targets. Nobody on your team has decided any of it yet. Whatever stays undecided gets filled in by the tool's defaults or the old tool's settings, and leadership has already asked how long this will take.

[Read More]

You asked the requester a question twelve days ago. The ticket has gone silent, and it's still one of the oldest in your queue. Every message you could send feels either too soft to work or too blunt to send to a coworker. Close it quietly and the person may write back next month to say they never saw your question, or your report may credit you with a fix nobody checked. A closing ticket due to no response template helps most when the message, the status and the report all say the same thing about what happened.

[Read More]

Picture a ticket many desks have seen. A user can't sign in at a PC that someone else used last, and she tells the technician the sign-in box usually shows her name. By the afternoon the story is regrettably a joke in the IT team's chat. But the sign-in box did show a name, the last user's, so her surprise was reasonable. What looked like a user problem was partly a screen problem.

[Read More]

Imagine this: a phone goes down for five minutes, someone in IT reboots it, and the fix gets reported. But instead of creating a ticket, the fix gets logged in a team chat under the premise, "It was just a little thing. It didn't require its own ticket." What sounds like a relatively benign exchange between colleagues actually captures a critical service-desk debate: whether quick fixes and routine requests are too minor to become tickets, or whether every example of human-handled IT work belongs in the system of record.

[Read More]

At 2 a.m., the floor does not experience an "IT incident." The floor sees a missing chart, a scan that won't open, and a charge nurse who has to switch to paper. That is what an Electronic Health Record (EHR) or connected clinical system failure actually looks like. The outage is technical. The risk is to the patient.

[Read More]

An IT dashboard can look perfect and still be lying to you. Every ticket closes on time, average response time keeps trending down, and the Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT) sits comfortably above 80%. None of that tells you about the employee who waited three days for a password reset and now just messages a coworker instead of opening a ticket, because logging one felt like more trouble than it was worth. That gap between what the dashboard reports and what employees actually experience is the real problem behind help desk customer satisfaction, and it plays out differently on an internal IT desk than it does on a customer-facing support line.

[Read More]

A mid-market software deal can look simple from the outside. Before purchase, an IT manager requests a demo and a CFO reviews the contract, and after purchase and six weeks after go-live, a help desk ticket comes in from an end user who was never trained on the new system. Three different people, three different times in the process, three completely different interactions, and all three are part of the same B2B customer journey.

[Read More]

Chances are you clicked on this article because something has been feeling "off" with your company's customer experience. Perhaps you're seeing rising escalations, inconsistent reviews, or an up-tick in customer churn. And regrettably, you've got no defined path forward besides running yet another customer experience survey.

[Read More]

The escalation plan is clear. The shift-handoff process is documented in detail. Yet on a normal Tuesday afternoon both sit unused while the help desk team runs on habit and memory. Tickets age past their windows and context disappears at shift change. The well-run help desk that exists on paper looks very different from the one operating in real time.

[Read More]